哲学史-philosophy of history(英文版)-第12部分

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


insisted　upon；　and　the　very　dogmatic　opinions　asserted；　must　be　examined。　At　no　time　so　much　as
in　our　own；　have　such　general　principles　and　notions　been　advanced；　or　with　greater　assurance。　If
in　days　gone　by；　history　seems　to　present　itself　as　a　struggle　of　passions；　in　our　time　—　though
displays　of　passion　are　not　wanting　—　it　exhibits　partly　a　predominance　of　the　struggle　of　notions
assuming　the　authority　of　principles；　partly　that　of　passions　and　interests　essentially　subjective；　but
under　the　mask　of　such　higher　sanctions。　The　pretensions　thus　contended　for　as　legitimate　in　the
name　of　that　which　has　been　stated　as　the　ultimate　aim　of　Reason；　pass　accordingly；　for　absolute
aims；　—　to　the　same　extent　as　Religion；　Morals；　Ethics。　Nothing；　as　before　remarked；　is　now　more
mon　than　the　plaint　that　the　ideals　which　imagination　sets　up　are　not　realised　—　that　these
glorious　dreams　are　destroyed　by　cold　actuality。　These　Ideals　—　which　in　the　voyage　of　life
founder　on　the　rocks　of　hard　reality　—　may　be　in　the　first　instance　only　subjective；　and　belong　to
the　idiosyncrasy　of　the　individual；　imagining　himself　the　highest　and　wisest。　Such　do　not　properly
belong　to　this　category。　For　the　fancies　which　the　individual　in　his　isolation　indulges；　cannot　be　the
model　for　universal　reality；　just　as　universal　law　is　not　designed　for　the　units　of　the　mass。　These　as
such　may；　in　fact；　find　their　interests　decidedly　thrust　into　the　background。　But　by　the　term
“Ideal；”　we　also　understand　the　ideal　of　Reason；　of　the　Good；　of　the　True。　Poets；　as　e。g。
Schiller；　have　painted　such　ideals　touchingly　and　with　strong　emotion；　and　with　the　deeply
melancholy　conviction　that　they　could　not　be　realised。　In　affirming；　on　the　contrary　that　the
Universal　Reason　does　realise　itself；　we　leave　indeed　nothing　to　do　with　the　individual　empirically
regarded。　That　admits　of　degrees　of　better　and　worse；　since　here　chance　and　speciality　have
received　authority　from　the　Idea　to　exercise　their　monstrous　power。　Much；　therefore；　in　particular
aspects　of　the　grand　phenomenon　might　be　found　fault　with。　This　subjective　fault…finding；　—　which；
however；　only　keeps　in　view　the　individual　and　its　deficiency；　without　taking　notice　of　Reason
pervading　the　whole；　—　is　easy；　and　inasmuch　as　it　asserts　an　excellent　intention　with　regard　to　the
good　of　the　whole；　and　seems　to　result　from　a　kindly　heart；　it　feels　authorised　to　give　itself　airs　and
assume　great　consequence。　It　is　easier　to　discover　a　deficiency　in　individuals；　in　states；　and　in
Providence；　than　to　see　their　real　import　and　value。　For　in　this　merely　negative　fault…finding　a
proud　position　is　taken；　—　one　which　overlooks　the　object；　without　having　entered　into　it；　—
without　having　prehended　its　positive　aspect。　Age　generally　makes　men　more　tolerant；　youth　is
always　discontented。　The　tolerance　of　age　is　the　result　of　the　ripeness　of　a　judgment　which；　…　not
merely　as　the　result　of　indifference；　is　satisfied　even　with　what　is　inferior；　but；　more　deeply　taught
by　the　grave　experience　of　life；　has　been　led　to　perceive　the　substantial；　solid　worth　of　the　object
in　question。　The　insight　then　to　which　—　in　contradistinction　from　those　ideals　—　philosophy　is　to
lead　us；　is；　that　the　real　world　is　as　it　ought　to　be　—　that　the　truly　good　—　the　universal　divine
reason　—　is　not　a　mere　abstraction；　but　a　vital　principle　capable　of　realising　itself。　This　Good；　this
Reason；　in　its　most　concrete　form；　is　God。　God　governs　the　world；　the　actual　working　of　his
government　—　the　carrying　out　of　his　plan　—　is　the　History　of　the　World。　This　plan　philosophy
strives　to　prehend；　for　only　that　which　has　been　developed　as　the　result　of　it；　possesses　bona
fide　reality。　That　which　does　not　accord　with　it；　is　negative；　worthless　existence。　Before　the　pure
light　of　this　divine　Idea　—　which　is　no　mere　Idea　…　the　phantom　of　a　world　whose　events　are　an
incoherent　concourse　of　fortuitous　circumstances；　utterly　vanishes。　Philosophy　wishes　to　discover
the　substantial　purport；　the　real　side　of　the　divine　idea　and　to　justify　the　so　much　despised　Reality
of　things；　for　Reason　is　the　prehension　of　the　Divine　work。　But　as　to　what　concerns　the
perversion；　corruption；　and　ruin　of　religious；　ethical　and　moral　purposes；　and　states　of　society
generally；　it　must　be　affirmed；　that　in　their　essence　these　are　infinite　and　eternal；　but　that　the　forms
they　assume　may　be　of　a　limited　orders　and　consequently　belong　to　the　domain　of　mere　nature；
and　be　subject　to　the　sway　of　chance。　They　are　therefore　perishable；　and　exposed　to　decay　and
corruption。　Religion　and　morality　—　in　the　same　way　as　inherently　universal　essences　—　have　the
peculiarity　of　being　present　in　the　individual　soul；　in　the　full　extent　of　their　Idea；　and　therefore　truly
and　really；　although　they　may　not　manifest　themselves　in　it　in　extenso；　and　are　not　applied　to　fully
developed　relations。　The　religion；　the　morality　of　a　limited　sphere　of　life　—　that　of　a　shepherd　or　a
peasant；　e。g。　—　in　its　intensive　concentration　and　limitation　to　a　few　perfectly　simple　relations　of
life；　—　has　infinite　worth；　the　same　worth　as　the　religion　and　morality　of　extensive　knowledge；　and
of　an　existence　rich　in　the　pass　of　its　relations　and　actions。　This　inner　focus　—　this　simple
region　of　the　claims　of　subjective　freedom；　—　the　home　of　volition；　resolution；　and　action；　—　the
abstract　sphere　of　conscience；　—　that　which　prises　the　responsibility　and　moral　value　of　the
individual；　remains　untouched；　and　is　quite　shut　out　from　the　noisy　din　of　the　World's　History　—
including　not　merely　external　and　temporal　changes；　but　also　those　entailed　by　the　absolute
necessity　inseparable　from　the　realisation　of　the　Idea　of　Freedom　itself。　But　as　a　general　truth　this
must　be　regarded　as　settled；　that　whatever　in　the　world　possesses　claims　as　noble　and　glorious；
has　nevertheless　a　higher　existence　above　it。　The　claim　of　the　World…Spirit　rises　above　all　special
claims。　

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　39

These　observations　may　suffice　in　reference　to　the　means　which　the　World…Spirit　uses　for　realising
its　Idea。　Stated　simply　and　abstractly；　this　mediation　involves　the　activity　of　personal　existences　in
whom　Reason　is　present　as　their　absolute　substantial　being；　but　a　basis；　in　the　first　instance；　still
obscure　and　unknown　to　them。　But　the　subject　bees　more　plicated　and　difficult　when　we
regard　individuals　not　merely　in　their　aspect　of　activity；　but　more　concretely；　in　conjunction　with　a
particular　manifestation　of　that　activity　in　their　religion　and　morality；　—　forms　of　existence　which　are
intimately　connected　with　Reason；　and　share　in　its　absolute　claims。　Here　the　relation　of　mere
means　of　an　end　disappears；　and　the　chief　hearings　of　this　seeming　difficulty　in　reference　to　the
absolute　aim　of　Spirit；　have　been　briefly　considered。　




III。　Philosophic　History
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　ii。　The　Essential　Destiny　of　Reason

　　　　　　　　（3）　The　Embodiment　Spirit　Assumes　—　the　State

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　40

The　third　point　to　be　analysed　is；　therefore　…　what　is　the　object　to　be　realised　by　these　means；　i。e。
what　is　the　form　it　assumes　in　the　realm　of　reality。　We　have　spoken　of　means；　but　in　the　carrying
out　of　a　subjective；　limited　aim；　we　have　also　to　take　into　consideration　the　element　of　a　material；
either　already　present　or　which　has　to　be　procured。　Thus　the　question　would　arise：　What　is　the
material　in　which　the　Ideal　of　Reason　is　wrought　out？　The　primary　answer　would　be；　…　Personality
itself　…　human　desires　…　Subjectivity　generally。　In　human　knowledge　and　volition；　as　its　material
element；　Reason　attains　positive　existence。　We　have　considered　subjective　volition　where　it　has　an
object　which　is　the　truth　and　essence　of　a　reality；　viz。　where　it　constitutes　a　great　world…historical
passion。　As　a　subjective　will；　occupied　with　limited　passions；　it　is　dependent；　and　can　gratify　its
desires　only　within　the　limits　of　this　dependence。　But　the　subjective　will　has　also　a　substantial　life　…
a　reality；　…　in　which　it　moves　in　the　region　of　essential　being　and　has　the　essential　itself　as　the
object　of　its　existence。　This　essential　being　is　the　union　of　the　subjective　with　the　rational　Will：　it
is　the　moral　Whole；　the　State；　which　is　that　form　of　reality　in　which　the　individual　has　and　enjoys
his　freedom；　but　on　the　condition　of　his　recognition；　believing　in　and　willing　that　which　is　mon
to　the　Whole。　And　this　must　not　be　understood　as　if　the　subjective　will　of　the　social　unit　attained　its
gratification　and　enjoyment　through　that　mon　Will；　as　if　this　were　a　means　provided　for　its
benefit；　as　if　the　individual；　in　his　relations　to　other　individuals；　thus　limited　his　freedom；　in　order
that　this　universal　limitation　…　the　mutual　constraint　of　all　…　might　secure　a　small　space　of　liberty　for
each。　Rather；　we　affirm；　are　Law；　Morality；　Government；　and　they　alone；　the　positive　reality　and
pletion　of　Freedom。　Freedom　of　a　low　and　limited　order；　is　mere　caprice；　which　finds　its
exercise　in　the　sphere　of　particular　and　limited　desires。

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　§　41

Subjective　volition　…　Passion　…　is　that　which　sets　m